The Analytical data are the initial model outputs generated in the production workflow. These data are best suited for users who will carry out their own detailed statistical and uncertainty analyses on the dataset and place lower priority on the visual appearance of the dataset for cartographic purposes. Datasets for the nominal years of 2011 and 2016 are available.
The Cartographic products mask the initial model outputs to improve the visual appearance of the datasets. These data are best suited for users who prioritize visual appearance of the data for cartographic and illustrative purposes. Datasets for the nominal years of 2011 and 2016 are available.
The NLCD data are the result of further processing of the masked data. The goal was to generate three coordinated components. The components are (1) a dataset for the nominal year of 2011, (2) a dataset for the nominal year of 2016, and (3) a dataset that captures the change in canopy cover between the two nominal years of 2011 and 2016. For the NLCD data, the three components meet the criterion of “2011 TCC + change in TCC = 2016 TCC”. These NLCD data are best suited for users who require a coordinated three-component data stack where each pixel’s values meet the criterion of “2011 TCC + change in TCC = 2016 TCC”. Datasets for the nominal years of 2011 and 2016 are available, as well as a dataset that captures the change (loss or gain) in canopy cover between those two nominal years of 2011 and 2016, in areas where change was identified.
These tree canopy cover data are accessible for multiple user communities, through multiple channels and platforms, as listed below:The Hawaii TCC 2016 cartographic dataset is comprised of a single layer. The pixel values range from 0 to 99 percent. The background is represented by the value 255. The dataset has data gaps due to consistent clouds/shadows in the Landsat images used for modeling. These data gaps are represented by the value 110.
These data were collected using funding from the U.S. Government and can be used without additional permissions or fees. If you use these data in a publication, presentation, or other research product please use the following citation:
USDA Forest Service. 2019. Hawaii USFS 2016 Percent Tree Canopy (Cartographic Version). Salt Lake City, UT.
Appropriate use includes regional to national assessments of tree cover, total extent of tree cover, and aggregated summaries of tree cover. This product is the masked output from the initial modeling process.
The random forests regression algorithm (R Core Team 2017; Cutler et al. 2007; Breiman 2001) employed in creating this product calculates the mean of squared residuals along with percent variability explained by the model for assessing prediction reliability. The random forests models consisted of 500 decision trees, which were used to determine the final response value. The response of each tree depended on a randomly chosen subset of predictor variables chosen independently (with replacement) for evaluation by that tree. The responses of the trees were averaged to obtain an estimate of the dependent variable. Because the random forests bias correction option was used, it was possible to obtain estimates less than 0 or greater than 100. These estimates were reset to either 0 or 100. The estimates were also rounded to the nearest integer. The standard error is the square root of the variance of the estimates given by all trees.
References
Breiman, L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45:15–32.
Cutler, R.D.; Edwards, T.C.; Beard, K.H.; Cutler, A.; Hess, K.T.; Gibson, J.; Lawler, J.J. 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88 (11):2783-2792.
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL www.R-project.org.
References
McRoberts, Ronald E.; Hansen, Mark H. 1999. Annual forest inventories for the north central region of the United States. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics. 4(4): 361–371.
References
Baig, M.H.A.; Zhang, L.; Shuai, T.; Tong, Q. 2014 Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 8 at-satellite reflectance, Remote Sensing Letters 5(5):423-431
References
Ruefenacht, B. 2016. Comparison of three Landsat TM compositing methods: a case study using modeled tree canopy cover. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 82(3):199-211.
Zhu, Z.; Woodcock, C.E. 2012. Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment. 118(2012): 83-94.
References
Brand, G.J.; Nelson, M.D.; Wendt, D.G.; Nimerfro, K.K. 2000. The hexagon/panel system for selecting FIA plots under an annual inventory. In: McRoberts, R.E.; Reams, G.A.; Van Deusen, P.C., eds. Proceedings of the First Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium; Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-213. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station: 8-13.,
Breiman, L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45:15–32.
Brooks, E.B.; Thomas, V.A.; Wynne, R.H.; Coulston, J.W. 2012. Fitting the multitemporal curve: a fourier series approach to the missing data problem in remote sensing analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 50(9):3340-3353.
Coulston, J.W.; Moisen, G.G.; Wilson, B.T.; Finco, M.V.; Cohen, W.B.; Brewer, C.K. 2012. Modeling percent tree canopy cover: a pilot study. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 78(7): 715–727.
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL www.R-project.org.
Ruefenacht, B. 2016. Comparison of three Landsat TM compositing methods: a case study using modeled tree canopy cover. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 82(3):199-211.